<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In genealogy, is there a standard way to indicate information is a probability but not a certainty?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.culturegenealogysociety.com/genealogy/in-genealogy-is-there-a-standard-way-to-indicate-information-is-a-probability-but-not-a-certainty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.culturegenealogysociety.com/genealogy/in-genealogy-is-there-a-standard-way-to-indicate-information-is-a-probability-but-not-a-certainty/</link>
	<description>A blog about genealogy and its effects on culture and society.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 00:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: genealogist84</title>
		<link>http://www.culturegenealogysociety.com/genealogy/in-genealogy-is-there-a-standard-way-to-indicate-information-is-a-probability-but-not-a-certainty/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>genealogist84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturegenealogysociety.com/genealogy/in-genealogy-is-there-a-standard-way-to-indicate-information-is-a-probability-but-not-a-certainty/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Most genealogy programs have notes capability, so be sure to include the source of the information.  Some helpful abbreviations are Bef (before), Aft (after) and Abt (about) which are common in family trees.

Good luck,
Dave
--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most genealogy programs have notes capability, so be sure to include the source of the information.  Some helpful abbreviations are Bef (before), Aft (after) and Abt (about) which are common in family trees.</p>
<p>Good luck,<br />
Dave<br />
&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grannytoad</title>
		<link>http://www.culturegenealogysociety.com/genealogy/in-genealogy-is-there-a-standard-way-to-indicate-information-is-a-probability-but-not-a-certainty/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>grannytoad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturegenealogysociety.com/genealogy/in-genealogy-is-there-a-standard-way-to-indicate-information-is-a-probability-but-not-a-certainty/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Standard would be born OH, and your notes about census are evidence where he was enumerated. 

That said and done, because my gedcom's online and I want to be found, we are having to adapt slightly - my style would be: likely Montgomery Co, OH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Standard would be born OH, and your notes about census are evidence where he was enumerated. </p>
<p>That said and done, because my gedcom&#8217;s online and I want to be found, we are having to adapt slightly - my style would be: likely Montgomery Co, OH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

